Search by Keywords x
Indlaw Home                                                                                          contact us contact us | home help
 Welcome Guest | Oct 21 2014
 

HOME

Search By Databases
  

Subject Modules
  down

State Modules
  down

Legal Focus
  down

 

Login

  Subscribe


Latest Updates
Search by Databases
Indlaw Resources
Indlaw Channels

indlaw updates


Judgments

Deo Kalya Patil and others vs Nagindas Shamjibhai Shah Through Lrs. and others  [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 15 Oct 2014]

Sarjeet Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. vs Hari Singh and others  [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 15 Oct 2014]

Dipanwita Roy vs Ronobroto Roy  [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 15 Oct 2014]

(1) Shree Agencies Private Limited; (2) R. S. I. Stone World Private Limited vs Madhya Pradesh State Mining Corporation and another  [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 15 Oct 2014]

Ashok Kumar Sharma vs State of Madhya Pradesh  [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 15 Oct 2014]

Lalit Kumar Jain vs Land and Building Department Govt. of (NCT of Delhi)  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Vishal Goyal vs Department of Legal Affairs Government of India  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Jitender Singh Tomar vs Land & Building Department Govt. of (NCT of Delhi)  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Satpal Singh Bhairupa Bhatinda vs Bar Council of Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Abdul Karim vs I.T.O., Kolkata  [INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 14 Oct 2014]

Income Tax Officer, Bareilly vs Food Corporation of India, Sitapur  [INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 14 Oct 2014]

Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune vs Ghatge Patil Transports Limited, Kolhapur  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Anand International vs Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

State Bank of India, Through its Regional Manager/Assistant General Manager, Nagpur vs Central Government Industrial, Nagpur and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Om Prakash Puri vs Nandita Puri  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Manoj S/o Narayanrao More vs Committee for Scrutiny & Verification of Tribe Claim, Amravati and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Textile Kamgar Sanghatana, Buttibori Through its President and others vs Hon'ble Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Jyotindra R. Shah and another vs Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Amit Satish Shah vs Archana Amit Shah and another  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Pawan Kumar Saini vs State of Madhya Pradesh  [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B - Bail - Entitlement of - Applicant was arrested for offence punishable u/ss. 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and section 3/4 of Examination Adhiniyam -

Held, considering the facts that applicant is in custody since 22-6-2014 and the charge sheet has since been filed where allegation against the applicant is of forgery and cheating to the extent of impersonation in the examination of Postal Assistant conducted on 22-6-2014, the applicant was found appearing in the examination on the place of some other candidate. Photograph on the admit card did not tally with the face of the applicant, but the factum of cheating and forgery is yet to be established and since investigation stands completed, it would not serve any purpose to keep the applicant in custody any more and trial is not likely to conclude in the near future and prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, HC is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant. Application allowed.


Mahesh Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh  [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]
Criminal - Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 341, 294, 147, 148, 149, 307 - Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, s.3(2)(v) - Bail - Entitlement of - Applicant was arrested for the offences punishable u/ss.341, 294, 147, 148, 149, 307 of IPC r/w. s. 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act -

Held, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view of the argument of applicant, but without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed.


Chhotu @ Bhupendra @ Adarsh Parmar vs State of Madhya Pradesh  [MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]
Criminal - Practice & Procedure - Central Excise Act, 1944, ss.34(2) and 47(a) - Bail - Entitlement of - Applicant was arrested in connection with Crime for the offence punishable u/ss. 34 (2) and 47(a) of the Act -

Held, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the arguments of applicant, but without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. Application allowed.


Raghavendra Rao vs Dr. Santosh J. Karmarkar and another  [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 14 Oct 2014]

R. K. Jain vs Department of Legal Affairs  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 14 Oct 2014]

Bandel Auxilium Educational Society vs J.C.I.T, Hooghly  [INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 14 Oct 2014]



 Copyright © 1997-2014 | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer