|
COURT STRUCTURE
1. How is the Court Structure
determined in the UK and what is their setup?
The structures of the courts in all three jurisdictions within
the United Kingdom are arranged according to the subject matter
of cases brought before the courts rather than the source of the
laws to be applied. The source of law did form the basis for a great
deal of court structure until the end of the nineteenth century
and even now has some influence.
Just like any other country following common law system, the United
Kingdom also posses a hierarchal setup of courts, with the House
of Lords being the highest court of appeal and courts such as the
Court Of Appeal, The High Court, Crown Court, etc being subordinate
to it. A diagrammatic representation of the setup is as follows:
2. How did the Constitutional Reform
Act, 2005 affect the Court Set-up in UK?
The Constitutional Reform Act, 2005 has brought about the following
changes:
1. The House of Lords which is the Highest Appeal Court in almost
all cases in England and Wales will now be the ‘Supreme Court of
the United Kingdom’.
2. The Supreme Court of Judicature of England and Wales is the most
important superior court of England and Wales. It consists of:
- Court of Appeal
- High Court of Justice
- Crown Court
When all the provisions of The Constitutional Reform Act, 2005 come
into force, courts comprised in The Supreme Court (of Judicature)
of England and Wales will become Senior Courts of England and Wales.
This is consequent to the establishment of Supreme Court Of United
Kingdom.
3. What is the jurisdiction of the
Administrative Court?
The jurisdiction on the Administrative Court is varied, consisting
of the administrative law jurisdiction of England and Wales as well
as a supervisory jurisdiction over inferior courts and tribunals.
The supervisory jurisdiction, exercised in the main through the
procedure of Judicial Review, covers persons or bodies exercising
a public law function - a wide and still growing field. Examples
of the types of decision which may fall within the range of Judicial
Review include:
- Decisions of local authorities in the exercise of their duties
to provide various welfare benefits and special education for
children in need of such education;
- Certain decisions of the immigration authorities and Immigration
Appellate Authority;
- Decisions of regulatory bodies;
- Decisions relating to prisoner's rights.
Appendix A sets out a brief description of the types of cases dealt
with and how the work is divided between single judge courts and Divisional
Courts (which consist of at least two judges and normally consist
of a Lord Justice of Appeal sitting with a judge of the High Court).
4. What does the Chancery Division
do?
The work of the Chancery Division covers a broad spectrum. It deals
with many different matters between including:
- Landlord and tenant and disputes concerning property
- Intellectual Property,
- Patents
- Trademarks
Copyright and passing-off form an important part of the work of the
Division as does Insolvency and its many aspects. Commercial frauds
and business disputes form part of its work , together with the management
of Companies; many of them international. The Division is increasingly
involved with financial regulatory work and Director disqualification
and Professional negligence.
5. What does the Court of Appeal
Do?
The Court of Appeal, which sits in London at the Royal Courts of
Justice, consists of two divisions:
(i) The Civil Division, which hears appeals from:
- The three divisions of the High Court (Chancery, Queen's Bench
and Family Division)
- From the County Courts across England and Wales,
- From certain Tribunals such as the Employment Appeal Tribunal,
the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, the Lands Tribunal and the Social
Security Commissioners.
(ii) The Criminal Division, which hears appeals from the Crown Court.
The Court of Appeal is the highest court within the Supreme Court
of Judicature, which also includes the High Court and Crown Court.
In the House of Lords, as compared with the Court of Appeal, there
are only 12 Lords of Appeal in Ordinary ("law lords"),
who usually sit in panels of five judges.
The Court of Appeal normally sits in up to 12 courts in the Royal
Courts of Justice.
Sir Anthony Clarke, the Master of the Rolls, is the President of
the Court of Appeal, Civil Division. He is also Head of Civil Justice.
Lord Justice Brooke is the Vice-President of the Court of Appeal
Civil Division.
There are 37 other regular judges of the Court of Appeal whose title
is Lord/Lady Justice. Many of them also sit in the Criminal Division
of the Court of Appeal and in the Divisional Court of the Queen's
Bench Division.
The other four Heads of Division also sit occasionally in the Civil
Division of the Court of Appeal. They are:
- Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the Lord Chief Justice of
England and Wales, who is also the President of the Criminal Division
of the Court of Appeal
- Sir Igor Judge, the President of the Queen's Bench Division
- Sir Mark Potter, the President of the Family Division
- Sir Andrew Morritt, the Chancellor
6. How is criminal justice dispensed?
There are 2 kinds of criminal trials: ‘summary’ and ‘on indictment’.
A summary trial takes place in the Magistrate’s Court while an on
indictment trial takes place in the Crown Court. However, despite
these 2 venues, all criminal trials invariably commence in the Magistrate’s
Court and then move upwards. In the Magistrate’s Court, a criminal
case may begin either by the defendant being charged and brought
forcibly before the magistrate or by being summoned.
There are 3 types of offences: ‘indictable only’, ‘summary’ and
‘either way’. Indictable offences are serious offences such as murder,
rape and are referred to the Crown Court by the magistrate on the
first appearance of the defendant before this Court. Summary offences
are less serious ones such as motoring offences which are mostly
decided in the Magistrate’s Court itself (over 90% cases) while
only a few are sent to the Crown Court. Either way offences are
intermediate offences such as theft and low value criminal damage,
which may be tried either summarily (by Magistrates) or by Judge
and Jury in Crown Court.
7. Where do appeals lie in criminal
cases?
Those defendants who are dissatisfied by the verdict may be able
to appeal:
- From the Magistrates’ Courts, there is an appeal to the Crown
Court on matters of fact or law.
- From the Crown Court, it might be possible to appeal to the
Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal on matters of fact or
law
- Certain legal disputes arising in the magistrates’ courts or
the Crown Court can be taken before the Divisional Court of the
High Court
- Finally, matters of important legal dispute arising in the
Crown Court or Divisional Court may be appealed to the House of
Lords
However, the method of appeal from the Crown Court is a little
more complex. When acting as an inferior court (i.e. hearing appeals
from magistrates) appeals lie to Queen’s Bench division of the High
Court and as a superior court (i.e. hearing trial on indictment)
to the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords.
8. What sort of matters does the
Crown court deal with?
The Crown Court deals with more serious criminal cases such as
murder, rape or robbery, some of which are on appeal or referred
from Magistrates' courts.
Trials are heard by a Judge and a 12 person jury. Members of the
public are selected for jury service or may have to go to court
as witnesses.
The Crown Court is based at 78 centres across England and Wales.
It deals with cases transferred from the Magistrates' Courts. It
also hears appeals against decisions of Magistrate's Courts, and
deals with cases sent for sentence from Magistrates' Courts.
9. Can an English citizen move the
Court of Justice of European Communities?
This Court of European Communities was set up under the Treaty
of Rome of 1957, by which the European Community was established.
The Court sits in Luxembourg and consists of judges appointed by
all 15 of the Member States (so there is one British judge). The
Court has been made part of the English legal system by virtue of
the European Communities Act 1972, section 3 of which states as
follows
"For the purposes of all legal proceedings any question as
to the meaning or effect of any of the Treaties, or as to the validity,
meaning or effect of any Community instrument, shall be treated
as a question of law (and, if not referred to the European court,
be for determination as such in accordance with the principles laid
down by and any relevant decision of the European Court)."
Its intervention can arise in two ways under Article 177 of the
Treaty of Rome. Firstly, "The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction
to give preliminary rulings concerning...the interpretation of this
Treaty ... when such a question is raised before any court of tribunal
of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, it if considers that
a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment,
request the Court of Justice to give a ruling thereon." This
means that any UK court, civil or criminal, can ask for its judgment
on a point of Community law if it is felt to be an important point
which is necessary for a decision. Secondly, "Where any such
question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal
of a Member State, against whose decisions there is no judicial
remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the
matter before the Court of Justice." This means that where
there is no further appeal from the national court (such as from
the House of Lords, the case must be referred on points of Community
law if they are in dispute.
|